study: apply to humans

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents evaluation
Weight: 0.64
, journal
Weight: 0.64
, treatment
Weight: 0.60
, indicator
Weight: 0.60
Siblings report
Weight: 0.66
, cost benefit analysis
Weight: 0.64
, astronomy
Weight: 0.62
, proportion
Weight: 0.61
, literature
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
apply to humans 1.00
be applied 0.82
be on rat behaviour applicable on humans 0.81
apply to math 0.80
be applied to human psychology 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(study, apply to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(proportion, apply to math)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(study, apply to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(proportion, apply to math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(proportion, apply to math)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(study, apply to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(study, apply to humans)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(study, apply to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(study, be on rat behaviour applicable on humans)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(study, apply to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(study, be on rat behaviour applicable on humans)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(study, apply to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(study, be applied to human psychology)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(study, apply to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(study, be on rat behaviour applicable on humans)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(study, apply to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(study, be on rat behaviour applicable on humans)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(study, apply to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(study, be applied to human psychology)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(study, apply to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(study, be applied to human psychology)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(study, apply to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(study, be applied to human psychology)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(study, apply to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(study, apply to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(study, apply to humans)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(study, apply to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(study, apply to humans)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(study, apply to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(proportion, apply to math)