study: be done on rats

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents evaluation
Weight: 0.64
, journal
Weight: 0.64
, treatment
Weight: 0.60
, indicator
Weight: 0.60
Siblings report
Weight: 0.66
, cost benefit analysis
Weight: 0.64
, astronomy
Weight: 0.62
, proportion
Weight: 0.61
, literature
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
be done on rats 1.00
be on rat behaviour 0.82
be on rat behaviour applicable on humans 0.78
is done 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(study, be done on rats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(cost benefit analysis, is done)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(study, be done on rats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(cost benefit analysis, is done) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(cost benefit analysis, is done)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(study, be done on rats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(study, be done on rats)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(study, be done on rats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(study, be on rat behaviour applicable on humans)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(study, be done on rats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(study, be on rat behaviour applicable on humans)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(study, be done on rats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(study, be on rat behaviour applicable on humans)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(study, be done on rats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(study, be on rat behaviour applicable on humans)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(study, be done on rats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(study, be done on rats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(study, be done on rats)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(study, be done on rats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(study, be done on rats)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(study, be done on rats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(cost benefit analysis, is done)