study: relate to aids

Related concepts

Parents	evaluation Weight: 0.64 , journal Weight: 0.64 , treatment Weight: 0.60 , indicator Weight: 0.60
Siblings	report Weight: 0.66 , cost benefit analysis Weight: 0.64 , astronomy Weight: 0.62 , proportion Weight: 0.61 , literature Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property	Similarity
relate to aids	1.00
relate to science	0.76
relate to idea	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Remarkable(study, relate to aids) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(astronomy, relate to science)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.28

Plausible(study, relate to aids) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

Remarkable(astronomy, relate to science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Plausible(astronomy, relate to science)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.28

Plausible(study, relate to aids) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Salient(study, relate to aids)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.49

Salient(study, relate to aids) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Typical(study, relate to aids) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Remarkable(study, relate to aids)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.28

Plausible(study, relate to aids) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Typical(study, relate to aids)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Remarkable(study, relate to aids) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Typical(astronomy, relate to science)