study: smarter

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents evaluation
Weight: 0.64
, journal
Weight: 0.64
, treatment
Weight: 0.60
, indicator
Weight: 0.60
Siblings report
Weight: 0.66
, cost benefit analysis
Weight: 0.64
, astronomy
Weight: 0.62
, proportion
Weight: 0.61
, literature
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
smarter 1.00
be better than movies 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(study, smarter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(literature, be better than movies)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(study, smarter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(literature, be better than movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(literature, be better than movies)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(study, smarter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(study, smarter)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(study, smarter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(study, smarter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(study, smarter)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(study, smarter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(study, smarter)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(study, smarter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(literature, be better than movies)