style: be important in art

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents aspect
Weight: 0.64
, element
Weight: 0.63
, concept
Weight: 0.61
, practice
Weight: 0.60
Siblings craftsman
Weight: 0.69
, baroque
Weight: 0.68
, ragtime
Weight: 0.68
, realism
Weight: 0.66
, rockabilly
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in art 1.00
be important in photography 0.82
be important in literature 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(element, be important in art)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(style, be important in art)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(style, be important in art)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(element, be important in art)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(style, be important in art)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(element, be important in art)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(style, be important in art)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(realism, be important in art)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(style, be important in art)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(realism, be important in literature)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(element, be important in art)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(style, be important in art)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(style, be important in art)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(style, be important in art)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(realism, be important in art)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(realism, be important in art)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(style, be important in art)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(realism, be important in literature)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(realism, be important in literature)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(style, be important in art)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(style, be important in art)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(style, be important in art)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(style, be important in photography)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(style, be important in art)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(style, be important in literature)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(style, be important in art)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(style, be important in photography)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(style, be important in art)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(style, be important in photography)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(style, be important in art)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(style, be important in literature)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(style, be important in art)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(style, be important in literature)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(style, be important in art)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(style, be important in photography)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(style, be important in art)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(style, be important in literature)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(style, be important in art)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(style, be important in art)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(style, be important in art)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(style, be important in art)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(style, be important in art)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(style, be important in art)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(element, be important in art)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(style, be important in art)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(realism, be important in art)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(style, be important in art)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(realism, be important in literature)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(style, be important in art)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(element, be important in art)