style: be important in writing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents aspect
Weight: 0.64
, element
Weight: 0.63
, concept
Weight: 0.61
, practice
Weight: 0.60
Siblings craftsman
Weight: 0.69
, baroque
Weight: 0.68
, ragtime
Weight: 0.68
, realism
Weight: 0.66
, rockabilly
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in writing 1.00
be important in literature 0.77
be important for reader 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(style, be important in writing)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(realism, be important in literature)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(style, be important in writing)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(realism, be important in literature)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(realism, be important in literature)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(style, be important in writing)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(style, be important in writing)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(style, be important in writing)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(style, be important in literature)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(style, be important in writing)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(style, be important for reader)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(style, be important in writing)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(style, be important in literature)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(style, be important in writing)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(style, be important for reader)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(style, be important in writing)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(style, be important in literature)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(style, be important in writing)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(style, be important for reader)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(style, be important in writing)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(style, be important in literature)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(style, be important in writing)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(style, be important for reader)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(style, be important in writing)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(style, be important in writing)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(style, be important in writing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(style, be important in writing)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(style, be important in writing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(style, be important in writing)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(realism, be important in literature)