sub: be in color

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fast food
Weight: 0.53
, right
Weight: 0.52
, place
Weight: 0.51
, speaker
Weight: 0.50
Siblings boomer
Weight: 0.46
, other place
Weight: 0.31
, chinese food
Weight: 0.30
, section
Weight: 0.30
, west point
Weight: 0.29

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in color 1.00
has color yellow 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(fast food, has color yellow)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(sub, be in color)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(sub, be in color)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(fast food, has color yellow)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(sub, be in color)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(fast food, has color yellow)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(fast food, has color yellow)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(sub, be in color)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(sub, be in color)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(sub, be in color)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(sub, be in color)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(sub, be in color)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(sub, has color yellow)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(sub, be in color)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(sub, has color yellow)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(sub, be in color)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(sub, has color yellow)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(sub, be in color)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(sub, has color yellow)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(sub, be in color)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(sub, be in color)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(sub, be in color)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(sub, be in color)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(sub, be in color)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(sub, be in color)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(fast food, has color yellow)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(sub, be in color)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(fast food, has color yellow)