sub: have red lights

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fast food
Weight: 0.53
, right
Weight: 0.52
, place
Weight: 0.51
, speaker
Weight: 0.50
Siblings boomer
Weight: 0.46
, other place
Weight: 0.31
, chinese food
Weight: 0.30
, section
Weight: 0.30
, west point
Weight: 0.29

Related properties

Property Similarity
have red lights 1.00
have lights 0.95
has color yellow 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(fast food, has color yellow) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(sub, have red lights)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(sub, have red lights) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(fast food, has color yellow)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(sub, have red lights) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(fast food, has color yellow)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(fast food, has color yellow) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(sub, have red lights) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(sub, have red lights)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(sub, have red lights) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(sub, have red lights)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(sub, have red lights) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(sub, has color yellow)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(sub, have red lights) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(sub, has color yellow)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(sub, have red lights) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(sub, has color yellow)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(sub, have red lights) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(sub, has color yellow)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(sub, have red lights) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(sub, have red lights) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(sub, have red lights)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(sub, have red lights) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(sub, have red lights)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(sub, have red lights) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(fast food, has color yellow)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(sub, have red lights) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(fast food, has color yellow)