subduction: has state stop

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents process
Weight: 0.59
, fact
Weight: 0.36
, mechanism
Weight: 0.33
Siblings hydrolysis
Weight: 0.33
, speciation
Weight: 0.33
, fermentation
Weight: 0.33
, oxidation
Weight: 0.32
, combustion
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state stop 1.00
stop 0.89
has state state 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(subduction, has state stop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(fermentation, stop)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(subduction, has state stop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(oxidation, has state state)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(subduction, has state stop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(fermentation, stop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(fermentation, stop)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(subduction, has state stop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(oxidation, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(oxidation, has state state)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(subduction, has state stop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(subduction, has state stop)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(subduction, has state stop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(subduction, stop)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(subduction, has state stop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(subduction, stop)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(subduction, has state stop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(subduction, stop)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(subduction, has state stop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(subduction, stop)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(subduction, has state stop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(subduction, has state stop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(subduction, has state stop)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(subduction, has state stop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(subduction, has state stop)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(subduction, has state stop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(fermentation, stop)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(subduction, has state stop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(oxidation, has state state)