subway platform: is hot

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents place
Weight: 0.52
Siblings subway
Weight: 0.35
, bus stop
Weight: 0.31
, sidewalk
Weight: 0.31
, plaza
Weight: 0.31
, elevator
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
is hot 1.00
is hottest 0.81
expand in hot weather 0.80
be near equator hot 0.76
be along equator hot 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(subway platform, is hot)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(sidewalk, is hot)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(subway platform, is hot)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(subway, is hot)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(subway platform, is hot)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(sidewalk, expand in hot weather)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(subway platform, is hot)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(subway, is hot)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(subway, is hot)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(subway platform, is hot)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(sidewalk, is hot)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(sidewalk, is hot)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(subway platform, is hot)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(sidewalk, expand in hot weather)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(sidewalk, expand in hot weather)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(subway platform, is hot)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(subway platform, is hot)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(subway platform, is hot)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(subway platform, is hot)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(subway platform, is hot)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(subway platform, is hot)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(subway platform, is hot)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(subway platform, is hot)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(sidewalk, is hot)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(subway platform, is hot)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(subway, is hot)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(subway platform, is hot)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(sidewalk, expand in hot weather)