sudan: be in poverty

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents genocide
Weight: 0.61
, country
Weight: 0.58
, hot spot
Weight: 0.57
, state
Weight: 0.56
, nation
Weight: 0.55
Siblings central african republic
Weight: 0.34
, zambia
Weight: 0.34
, central american country
Weight: 0.33
, libya
Weight: 0.33
, zimbabwe
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in poverty 1.00
be in south poverty 0.96

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(sudan, be in poverty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(zambia, be in poverty)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(sudan, be in poverty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(central african republic, be in poverty)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(sudan, be in poverty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, be in poverty)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(sudan, be in poverty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(zambia, be in poverty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(zambia, be in poverty)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(sudan, be in poverty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(zimbabwe, be in poverty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(zimbabwe, be in poverty)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(sudan, be in poverty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(central african republic, be in poverty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(central african republic, be in poverty)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(sudan, be in poverty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(sudan, be in poverty)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(sudan, be in poverty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(sudan, be in south poverty)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(sudan, be in poverty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(sudan, be in south poverty)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(sudan, be in poverty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(sudan, be in south poverty)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(sudan, be in poverty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(sudan, be in south poverty)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(sudan, be in poverty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(sudan, be in poverty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(sudan, be in poverty)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(sudan, be in poverty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(sudan, be in poverty)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(sudan, be in poverty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(zambia, be in poverty)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(sudan, be in poverty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(zimbabwe, be in poverty)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(sudan, be in poverty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(central african republic, be in poverty)