sudan: is developed

Related concepts

Parents	genocide Weight: 0.61 , country Weight: 0.58 , hot spot Weight: 0.57 , state Weight: 0.56 , nation Weight: 0.55
Siblings	central african republic Weight: 0.34 , zambia Weight: 0.34 , central american country Weight: 0.33 , libya Weight: 0.33 , zimbabwe Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property	Similarity
is developed	1.00
is developed country	0.91
is less developed country	0.85
is developing	0.84
is developing country	0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(sudan, is developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Remarkable(libya, is developing)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(sudan, is developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Remarkable(zambia, is developing)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(sudan, is developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Remarkable(libya, is developing country)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(sudan, is developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(zambia, is developing country)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(sudan, is developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, is developing)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(sudan, is developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, is developing country)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.46

Plausible(sudan, is developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

Remarkable(libya, is developing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Plausible(libya, is developing)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.46

Plausible(sudan, is developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

Remarkable(zimbabwe, is developing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Plausible(zimbabwe, is developing)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.46

Plausible(sudan, is developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

Remarkable(zambia, is developing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Plausible(zambia, is developing)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.46

Plausible(sudan, is developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

Remarkable(libya, is developing country) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Plausible(libya, is developing country)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.46

Plausible(sudan, is developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

Remarkable(zimbabwe, is developing country) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Plausible(zimbabwe, is developing country)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.46

Plausible(sudan, is developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

Remarkable(zambia, is developing country) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Plausible(zambia, is developing country)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.46

Plausible(sudan, is developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Salient(sudan, is developed)

Similarity expansion

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.46

Plausible(sudan, is developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Plausible(sudan, is developed country)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.55

Salient(sudan, is developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Salient(sudan, is developed country)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.46

Typical(sudan, is developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Typical(sudan, is developed country)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.68

Remarkable(sudan, is developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Remarkable(sudan, is developed country)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.68

Remarkable(sudan, is developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Remarkable(sudan, is developing)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.68

Remarkable(sudan, is developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(sudan, is less developed country)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.55

Salient(sudan, is developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Salient(sudan, is less developed country)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.55

Salient(sudan, is developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Salient(sudan, is developing)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.46

Plausible(sudan, is developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Plausible(sudan, is less developed country)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.68

Remarkable(sudan, is developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(sudan, is developing country)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.46

Typical(sudan, is developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Typical(sudan, is less developed country)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.46

Plausible(sudan, is developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Plausible(sudan, is developing)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.46

Typical(sudan, is developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(sudan, is developing)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.55

Salient(sudan, is developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Salient(sudan, is developing country)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.46

Plausible(sudan, is developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Plausible(sudan, is developing country)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.46

Typical(sudan, is developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(sudan, is developing country)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.55

Salient(sudan, is developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Typical(sudan, is developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(sudan, is developed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.46

Plausible(sudan, is developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Typical(sudan, is developed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(sudan, is developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Typical(libya, is developing)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(sudan, is developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Typical(zambia, is developing)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(sudan, is developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Typical(zimbabwe, is developing)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(sudan, is developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Typical(libya, is developing country)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(sudan, is developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Typical(zimbabwe, is developing country)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(sudan, is developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(zambia, is developing country)