sudan: is food insecure

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents genocide
Weight: 0.61
, country
Weight: 0.58
, hot spot
Weight: 0.57
, state
Weight: 0.56
, nation
Weight: 0.55
Siblings central african republic
Weight: 0.34
, zambia
Weight: 0.34
, central american country
Weight: 0.33
, libya
Weight: 0.33
, zimbabwe
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is food insecure 1.00
have food insecurity 0.84
have food security 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(sudan, is food insecure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(zambia, is food insecure)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(sudan, is food insecure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, is food insecure)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(sudan, is food insecure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(zambia, have food insecurity)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(sudan, is food insecure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, have food insecurity)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(sudan, is food insecure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, have food security)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(sudan, is food insecure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(zambia, is food insecure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(zambia, is food insecure)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(sudan, is food insecure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(zimbabwe, is food insecure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(zimbabwe, is food insecure)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(sudan, is food insecure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(zambia, have food insecurity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(zambia, have food insecurity)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(sudan, is food insecure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(zimbabwe, have food insecurity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(zimbabwe, have food insecurity)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(sudan, is food insecure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(zimbabwe, have food security) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(zimbabwe, have food security)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(sudan, is food insecure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(sudan, is food insecure)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(sudan, is food insecure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(sudan, have food insecurity)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(sudan, is food insecure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(sudan, have food insecurity)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(sudan, is food insecure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(sudan, have food security)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(sudan, is food insecure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(sudan, have food security)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(sudan, is food insecure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(sudan, have food insecurity)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(sudan, is food insecure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(sudan, have food insecurity)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(sudan, is food insecure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(sudan, have food security)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(sudan, is food insecure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(sudan, have food security)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(sudan, is food insecure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(sudan, is food insecure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(sudan, is food insecure)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(sudan, is food insecure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(sudan, is food insecure)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(sudan, is food insecure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(zambia, is food insecure)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(sudan, is food insecure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(zimbabwe, is food insecure)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(sudan, is food insecure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(zambia, have food insecurity)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(sudan, is food insecure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(zimbabwe, have food insecurity)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(sudan, is food insecure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(zimbabwe, have food security)