sugar glider: be illegal in new city

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mammal
Weight: 0.59
, creature
Weight: 0.58
, possum
Weight: 0.56
, animal
Weight: 0.55
Siblings hammerhead shark
Weight: 0.33
, sea otter
Weight: 0.33
, tree frog
Weight: 0.33
, dung beetle
Weight: 0.33
, water buffalo
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be illegal in new city 1.00
be illegal in city 0.97
is illegal 0.89
be illegal in new york city 0.88
be illegal in york city 0.85
be illegal in states 0.84
be illegal in nyc 0.78
be illegal in alaska 0.77
be illegal in california 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(sugar glider, be illegal in new city)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(sugar glider, be illegal in new city)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(sugar glider, be illegal in new city)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(sugar glider, be illegal in city)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(sugar glider, be illegal in new city)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(sugar glider, be illegal in city)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(sugar glider, be illegal in new city)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(sugar glider, be illegal in city)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(sugar glider, be illegal in new city)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(sugar glider, be illegal in city)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(sugar glider, be illegal in new city)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(sugar glider, is illegal)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(sugar glider, be illegal in new city)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(sugar glider, be illegal in york city)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(sugar glider, be illegal in new city)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(sugar glider, be illegal in york city)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(sugar glider, be illegal in new city)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(sugar glider, be illegal in new york city)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(sugar glider, be illegal in new city)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(sugar glider, be illegal in york city)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(sugar glider, be illegal in new city)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(sugar glider, be illegal in states)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(sugar glider, be illegal in new city)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(sugar glider, is illegal)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(sugar glider, be illegal in new city)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(sugar glider, be illegal in states)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(sugar glider, be illegal in new city)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(sugar glider, be illegal in york city)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(sugar glider, be illegal in new city)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(sugar glider, is illegal)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(sugar glider, be illegal in new city)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(sugar glider, be illegal in states)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(sugar glider, be illegal in new city)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(sugar glider, be illegal in states)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(sugar glider, be illegal in new city)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(sugar glider, is illegal)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(sugar glider, be illegal in new city)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(sugar glider, be illegal in california)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(sugar glider, be illegal in new city)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(sugar glider, be illegal in nyc)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(sugar glider, be illegal in new city)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(sugar glider, be illegal in california)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(sugar glider, be illegal in new city)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(sugar glider, be illegal in nyc)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(sugar glider, be illegal in new city)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(sugar glider, be illegal in nyc)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(sugar glider, be illegal in new city)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(sugar glider, be illegal in california)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(sugar glider, be illegal in new city)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(sugar glider, be illegal in california)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(sugar glider, be illegal in new city)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(sugar glider, be illegal in nyc)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(sugar glider, be illegal in new city)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(sugar glider, be illegal in new york city)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(sugar glider, be illegal in new city)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(sugar glider, be illegal in alaska)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(sugar glider, be illegal in new city)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(sugar glider, be illegal in new york city)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(sugar glider, be illegal in new city)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(sugar glider, be illegal in new york city)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(sugar glider, be illegal in new city)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(sugar glider, be illegal in alaska)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(sugar glider, be illegal in new city)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(sugar glider, be illegal in alaska)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(sugar glider, be illegal in new city)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(sugar glider, be illegal in alaska)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(sugar glider, be illegal in new city)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(sugar glider, be illegal in new city)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(sugar glider, be illegal in new city)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(sugar glider, be illegal in new city)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(sugar glider, be illegal in new city)