sugar glider: has state pets

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mammal
Weight: 0.59
, creature
Weight: 0.58
, possum
Weight: 0.56
, animal
Weight: 0.55
Siblings hammerhead shark
Weight: 0.33
, sea otter
Weight: 0.33
, tree frog
Weight: 0.33
, dung beetle
Weight: 0.33
, water buffalo
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state pets 1.00
make pets 0.93
is good pets 0.93
has state pet 0.91
make good pets 0.90
is good pet 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(sugar glider, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(sugar glider, has state pets)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(sugar glider, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(sugar glider, make pets)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(sugar glider, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(sugar glider, is good pets)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(sugar glider, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(sugar glider, make good pets)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(sugar glider, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(sugar glider, has state pet)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(sugar glider, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(sugar glider, make pets)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(sugar glider, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(sugar glider, make pets)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(sugar glider, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(sugar glider, is good pet)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(sugar glider, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(sugar glider, make pets)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(sugar glider, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(sugar glider, is good pets)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(sugar glider, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(sugar glider, make good pets)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(sugar glider, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(sugar glider, is good pets)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(sugar glider, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(sugar glider, has state pet)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(sugar glider, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(sugar glider, make good pets)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(sugar glider, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(sugar glider, is good pet)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(sugar glider, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(sugar glider, is good pets)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(sugar glider, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(sugar glider, make good pets)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(sugar glider, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(sugar glider, has state pet)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(sugar glider, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(sugar glider, has state pet)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(sugar glider, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(sugar glider, is good pet)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(sugar glider, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(sugar glider, is good pet)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(sugar glider, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(sugar glider, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(sugar glider, has state pets)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(sugar glider, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(sugar glider, has state pets)