suit: is good show

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents action
Weight: 0.62
, garment
Weight: 0.60
, thing
Weight: 0.59
, attire
Weight: 0.58
Siblings lawsuit
Weight: 0.62
, tuxedo
Weight: 0.56
, dress
Weight: 0.34
, court case
Weight: 0.33
, litigation
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is good show 1.00
look good 0.80
has quality good 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(suit, is good show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(tuxedo, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(suit, is good show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(tuxedo, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(tuxedo, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(suit, is good show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(suit, is good show)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(suit, is good show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(suit, look good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(suit, is good show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(suit, look good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(suit, is good show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(suit, look good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(suit, is good show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(suit, look good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(suit, is good show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(suit, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(suit, is good show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(suit, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(suit, is good show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(suit, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(suit, is good show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(suit, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(suit, is good show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(suit, is good show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(suit, is good show)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(suit, is good show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(suit, is good show)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(suit, is good show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(tuxedo, has quality good)