sum: be served in threes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.60
, time
Weight: 0.56
, condition
Weight: 0.54
, property
Weight: 0.54
Siblings rent
Weight: 0.62
, bonus
Weight: 0.60
, damage
Weight: 0.57
, indemnity
Weight: 0.54
, bounty
Weight: 0.46

Related properties

Property Similarity
be served in threes 1.00
come in threes 0.93

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(sum, be served in threes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(sum, be served in threes)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(sum, be served in threes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(sum, come in threes)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(sum, be served in threes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(sum, come in threes)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(sum, be served in threes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(sum, come in threes)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(sum, be served in threes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(sum, come in threes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(sum, be served in threes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(sum, be served in threes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(sum, be served in threes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(sum, be served in threes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(sum, be served in threes)