summer: be in the southwest

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents month
Weight: 0.79
, season
Weight: 0.65
, day
Weight: 0.63
, part
Weight: 0.63
Siblings winter
Weight: 0.63
, hiking
Weight: 0.55
, week
Weight: 0.37
, spring
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in the southwest 1.00
be in north pole cold 0.76
be similar in central america 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(summer, be in the southwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(winter, be similar in central america)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(summer, be in the southwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(winter, be similar in central america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(winter, be similar in central america)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(summer, be in the southwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(summer, be in the southwest)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(summer, be in the southwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(summer, be in north pole cold)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(summer, be in the southwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(summer, be in north pole cold)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(summer, be in the southwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(summer, be similar in central america)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(summer, be in the southwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(summer, be similar in central america)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(summer, be in the southwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(summer, be in north pole cold)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(summer, be in the southwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(summer, be similar in central america)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(summer, be in the southwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(summer, be in north pole cold)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(summer, be in the southwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(summer, be similar in central america)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(summer, be in the southwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(summer, be in the southwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(summer, be in the southwest)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(summer, be in the southwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(summer, be in the southwest)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(summer, be in the southwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(winter, be similar in central america)