summit: be at top of mountain

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents event
Weight: 0.60
, place
Weight: 0.53
, city
Weight: 0.53
, activity
Weight: 0.52
Siblings aconcagua
Weight: 0.35
, seminar
Weight: 0.33
, exposition
Weight: 0.32
, agenda
Weight: 0.32
, trip
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at top of mountain 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(summit, be at top of mountain)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(summit, be at top of mountain)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(summit, be at top of mountain)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(summit, be at top of mountain)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(summit, be at top of mountain)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(summit, be at top of mountain)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(summit, be at top of mountain)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(summit, be at top of mountain)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(summit, be at top of mountain)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(summit, be at top of mountain)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(summit, be at top of mountain)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(summit, be at top of mountain)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(summit, be at top of mountain)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(summit, be at top of mountain)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(summit, be at top of mountain)