summit: have big head

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents conference
Weight: 0.61
, event
Weight: 0.60
, gathering
Weight: 0.54
, place
Weight: 0.53
Siblings forum
Weight: 0.35
, aconcagua
Weight: 0.35
, meeting
Weight: 0.34
, national convention
Weight: 0.34
, convention
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
have big head 1.00
has physical part head 0.85
is big 0.84
is big deal 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(summit, have big head) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(meeting, is big deal)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(summit, have big head) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(meeting, is big deal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(meeting, is big deal)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(summit, have big head) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(summit, have big head)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(summit, have big head) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(summit, has physical part head)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(summit, have big head) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(summit, has physical part head)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(summit, have big head) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(summit, has physical part head)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(summit, have big head) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(summit, is big)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(summit, have big head) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(summit, is big)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(summit, have big head) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(summit, has physical part head)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(summit, have big head) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(summit, is big)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(summit, have big head) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(summit, is big)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(summit, have big head) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(summit, have big head) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(summit, have big head)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(summit, have big head) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(summit, have big head)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(summit, have big head) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(meeting, is big deal)