sunglasses: be called shades

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents accessory
Weight: 0.46
Siblings goggles
Weight: 0.31
, helmet
Weight: 0.30
, handbag
Weight: 0.30
, scarf
Weight: 0.30
, flashlight
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called shades 1.00
have colors 0.80
have different colors 0.79
has color pink 0.77
has color blue 0.77
have different lens colors 0.77
have lens colors 0.76
is tinted 0.76
has color orange 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(sunglasses, be called shades)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(goggles, has color pink)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(sunglasses, be called shades)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(flashlight, have different lens colors)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(sunglasses, be called shades)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(flashlight, has color orange)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(sunglasses, be called shades)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(goggles, is tinted)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(sunglasses, be called shades)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(flashlight, have lens colors)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(sunglasses, be called shades)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(flashlight, have lens colors)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(flashlight, have lens colors)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(sunglasses, be called shades)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(goggles, is tinted)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(goggles, is tinted)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(sunglasses, be called shades)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(flashlight, have different lens colors)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(flashlight, have different lens colors)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(sunglasses, be called shades)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(flashlight, has color orange)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(flashlight, has color orange)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(sunglasses, be called shades)
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(goggles, has color pink)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(goggles, has color pink)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(sunglasses, be called shades)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(sunglasses, be called shades)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(sunglasses, be called shades)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(sunglasses, have colors)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(sunglasses, be called shades)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(sunglasses, is tinted)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(sunglasses, be called shades)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(sunglasses, have colors)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(sunglasses, be called shades)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(sunglasses, is tinted)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(sunglasses, be called shades)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(sunglasses, have different colors)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(sunglasses, be called shades)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(sunglasses, have different colors)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(sunglasses, be called shades)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(sunglasses, have different colors)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(sunglasses, be called shades)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(sunglasses, have different colors)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(sunglasses, be called shades)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(sunglasses, is tinted)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(sunglasses, be called shades)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(sunglasses, have colors)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(sunglasses, be called shades)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(sunglasses, has color blue)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(sunglasses, be called shades)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(sunglasses, has color blue)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(sunglasses, be called shades)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(sunglasses, has color blue)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(sunglasses, be called shades)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(sunglasses, has color blue)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(sunglasses, be called shades)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(sunglasses, is tinted)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(sunglasses, be called shades)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(sunglasses, have colors)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(sunglasses, be called shades)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(sunglasses, be called shades)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(sunglasses, be called shades)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(sunglasses, be called shades)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(sunglasses, be called shades)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(sunglasses, be called shades)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(flashlight, have lens colors)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(sunglasses, be called shades)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(goggles, is tinted)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(sunglasses, be called shades)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(flashlight, have different lens colors)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(sunglasses, be called shades)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(goggles, has color pink)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(sunglasses, be called shades)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(flashlight, has color orange)