sunglasses: has physical part lenses

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents accessory
Weight: 0.46
Siblings goggles
Weight: 0.31
, helmet
Weight: 0.30
, handbag
Weight: 0.30
, scarf
Weight: 0.30
, flashlight
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part lenses 1.00
have blue lenses 0.92
have green lenses 0.91
have lens colors 0.86
have translucent lenses 0.86
have different lens colors 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(sunglasses, has physical part lenses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(goggles, have blue lenses)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(sunglasses, has physical part lenses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(flashlight, have different lens colors)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(sunglasses, has physical part lenses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(goggles, has physical part lenses)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(sunglasses, has physical part lenses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(flashlight, have lens colors)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(sunglasses, has physical part lenses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(goggles, has physical part lenses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(goggles, has physical part lenses)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(sunglasses, has physical part lenses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(flashlight, have lens colors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(flashlight, have lens colors)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(sunglasses, has physical part lenses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(flashlight, have different lens colors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(flashlight, have different lens colors)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(sunglasses, has physical part lenses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(goggles, have blue lenses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(goggles, have blue lenses)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(sunglasses, has physical part lenses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(sunglasses, has physical part lenses)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(sunglasses, has physical part lenses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(sunglasses, have translucent lenses)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(sunglasses, has physical part lenses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(sunglasses, have green lenses)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(sunglasses, has physical part lenses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(sunglasses, have translucent lenses)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(sunglasses, has physical part lenses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(sunglasses, have translucent lenses)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(sunglasses, has physical part lenses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(sunglasses, have translucent lenses)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(sunglasses, has physical part lenses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(sunglasses, have green lenses)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(sunglasses, has physical part lenses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(sunglasses, have green lenses)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(sunglasses, has physical part lenses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(sunglasses, have green lenses)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(sunglasses, has physical part lenses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(sunglasses, has physical part lenses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(sunglasses, has physical part lenses)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(sunglasses, has physical part lenses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(sunglasses, has physical part lenses)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(sunglasses, has physical part lenses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(goggles, has physical part lenses)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(sunglasses, has physical part lenses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(flashlight, have lens colors)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(sunglasses, has physical part lenses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(flashlight, have different lens colors)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(sunglasses, has physical part lenses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(goggles, have blue lenses)