sunscreen: go bad

Related concepts

Parents	product Weight: 0.63 , moisturizer Weight: 0.60 , liquid Weight: 0.58 , application Weight: 0.57 , thing Weight: 0.57
Siblings	lotion Weight: 0.36 , suntan lotion Weight: 0.35 , tanning lotion Weight: 0.35 , mouthwash Weight: 0.35 , deodorant Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property	Similarity
go bad	1.00
has quality bad	0.79
do	0.78
be bad for environment	0.77
be bad for babies	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Remarkable(sunscreen, go bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Remarkable(deodorant, be bad for environment)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Remarkable(sunscreen, go bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(deodorant, has quality bad)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Remarkable(sunscreen, go bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(mouthwash, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.36

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.28

Plausible(sunscreen, go bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

Remarkable(deodorant, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Plausible(deodorant, be bad for environment)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.28

Plausible(sunscreen, go bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

Remarkable(deodorant, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Plausible(deodorant, has quality bad)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.28

Plausible(sunscreen, go bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

Remarkable(mouthwash, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Plausible(mouthwash, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.28

Plausible(sunscreen, go bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Salient(sunscreen, go bad)

Similarity expansion

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.17

Remarkable(sunscreen, go bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Remarkable(sunscreen, be bad for babies)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.28

Plausible(sunscreen, go bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Plausible(sunscreen, be bad for babies)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.21

Salient(sunscreen, go bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Salient(sunscreen, be bad for babies)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.56

Typical(sunscreen, go bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Typical(sunscreen, be bad for babies)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.17

Remarkable(sunscreen, go bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Remarkable(sunscreen, be bad for environment)

...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.21

Salient(sunscreen, go bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(sunscreen, go bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Remarkable(sunscreen, go bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.28

Plausible(sunscreen, go bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(sunscreen, go bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Remarkable(sunscreen, go bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Typical(deodorant, be bad for environment)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Remarkable(sunscreen, go bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(deodorant, has quality bad)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Remarkable(sunscreen, go bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(mouthwash, has quality bad)