supermarket: use ict

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents grocery store
Weight: 0.76
, convenience store
Weight: 0.71
, food store
Weight: 0.71
, food chain
Weight: 0.62
, shopping center
Weight: 0.59
Siblings shop
Weight: 0.65
, carrefour
Weight: 0.50
, grocery
Weight: 0.39
, hardware store
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
use ict 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(supermarket, use ict) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(shop, use ict)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(supermarket, use ict) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(shop, use ict) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(shop, use ict)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(supermarket, use ict) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(supermarket, use ict)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(supermarket, use ict) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(supermarket, use ict) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(supermarket, use ict)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(supermarket, use ict) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(supermarket, use ict)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(supermarket, use ict) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(shop, use ict)