supermarket: use plastic

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents grocery store
Weight: 0.76
, convenience store
Weight: 0.71
, food store
Weight: 0.71
, food chain
Weight: 0.62
, shopping center
Weight: 0.59
Siblings shop
Weight: 0.65
, carrefour
Weight: 0.50
, grocery
Weight: 0.39
, hardware store
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
use plastic 1.00
use black plastic 0.95
use plastic bags 0.92
charge for plastic bags 0.86
wrap vegetables in plastic 0.81
use bags 0.76
use 99 0.76
use bottles 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(grocery store, use plastic bags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(supermarket, use plastic)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(grocery store, use bags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(supermarket, use plastic)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(supermarket, use plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(grocery store, use plastic bags)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(supermarket, use plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(grocery store, use bags)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(supermarket, use plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(grocery store, use plastic bags)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(supermarket, use plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(grocery store, use bags)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(supermarket, use plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(shop, charge for plastic bags)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(grocery store, use plastic bags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(supermarket, use plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(supermarket, use plastic)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(grocery store, use bags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(supermarket, use plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(supermarket, use plastic)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(supermarket, use plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(shop, charge for plastic bags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(shop, charge for plastic bags)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(supermarket, use plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(supermarket, use plastic)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(supermarket, use plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(supermarket, use black plastic)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(supermarket, use plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(supermarket, wrap vegetables in plastic)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(supermarket, use plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(supermarket, wrap vegetables in plastic)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(supermarket, use plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(supermarket, use black plastic)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(supermarket, use plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(supermarket, wrap vegetables in plastic)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(supermarket, use plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(supermarket, use plastic bags)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(supermarket, use plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(supermarket, use plastic bags)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(supermarket, use plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(supermarket, charge for plastic bags)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(supermarket, use plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(supermarket, use black plastic)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(supermarket, use plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(supermarket, use plastic bags)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(supermarket, use plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(supermarket, wrap vegetables in plastic)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(supermarket, use plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(supermarket, use black plastic)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(supermarket, use plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(supermarket, charge for plastic bags)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(supermarket, use plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(supermarket, use plastic bags)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(supermarket, use plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(supermarket, charge for plastic bags)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(supermarket, use plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(supermarket, charge for plastic bags)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(supermarket, use plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(supermarket, use plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(supermarket, use plastic)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(supermarket, use plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(supermarket, use plastic)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(supermarket, use plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(grocery store, use bags)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(supermarket, use plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(grocery store, use plastic bags)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(supermarket, use plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(shop, charge for plastic bags)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(supermarket, use plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(grocery store, use plastic bags)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(supermarket, use plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(grocery store, use bags)