support: be important in relationship

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents consideration
Weight: 0.60
, message
Weight: 0.58
, medium
Weight: 0.57
, extension
Weight: 0.57
, element
Weight: 0.57
Siblings strength
Weight: 0.32
, contribution
Weight: 0.32
, attention
Weight: 0.31
, vote
Weight: 0.31
, motivation
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in relationship 1.00
be important in friendship 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(support, be important in relationship)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(attention, be important in relationship)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(support, be important in relationship)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(attention, be important in relationship)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(attention, be important in relationship)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(support, be important in relationship)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(support, be important in relationship)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(support, be important in relationship)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(support, be important in friendship)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(support, be important in relationship)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(support, be important in friendship)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(support, be important in relationship)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(support, be important in friendship)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(support, be important in relationship)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(support, be important in friendship)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(support, be important in relationship)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(support, be important in relationship)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(support, be important in relationship)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(support, be important in relationship)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(support, be important in relationship)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(support, be important in relationship)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(attention, be important in relationship)