support: be important in team

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents consideration
Weight: 0.60
, message
Weight: 0.58
, medium
Weight: 0.57
, extension
Weight: 0.57
, element
Weight: 0.57
Siblings strength
Weight: 0.32
, contribution
Weight: 0.32
, attention
Weight: 0.31
, vote
Weight: 0.31
, motivation
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in team 1.00
be important in sport 0.80
be important in family 0.77
be important in system 0.76
be considered bad players 0.76
be from family important 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(support, be important in team)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(contribution, be important in team)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(support, be important in team)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(attention, be important in sport)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(support, be important in team)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(strength, be important in sport)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(support, be important in team)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(motivation, be important in sport)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(support, be important in team)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(contribution, be important in team)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(contribution, be important in team)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(support, be important in team)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(motivation, be important in sport)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(motivation, be important in sport)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(support, be important in team)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(strength, be important in sport)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(strength, be important in sport)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(support, be important in team)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(attention, be important in sport)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(attention, be important in sport)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(support, be important in team)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(support, be important in team)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(support, be important in team)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(support, be considered bad players)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(support, be important in team)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(support, be considered bad players)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(support, be important in team)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(support, be considered bad players)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(support, be important in team)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(support, be important in family)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(support, be important in team)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(support, be important in sport)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(support, be important in team)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(support, be from family important)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(support, be important in team)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(support, be important in system)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(support, be important in team)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(support, be important in system)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(support, be important in team)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(support, be important in sport)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(support, be important in team)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(support, be important in sport)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(support, be important in team)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(support, be important in sport)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(support, be important in team)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(support, be important in family)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(support, be important in team)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(support, be important in system)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(support, be important in team)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(support, be from family important)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(support, be important in team)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(support, be considered bad players)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(support, be important in team)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(support, be important in system)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(support, be important in team)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(support, be important in family)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(support, be important in team)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(support, be from family important)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(support, be important in team)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(support, be important in family)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(support, be important in team)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(support, be from family important)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(support, be important in team)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(support, be important in team)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(support, be important in team)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(support, be important in team)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(support, be important in team)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(support, be important in team)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(motivation, be important in sport)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(support, be important in team)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(contribution, be important in team)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(support, be important in team)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(attention, be important in sport)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(support, be important in team)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(strength, be important in sport)