supreme court: be called protector of fundamental rights

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents court case
Weight: 0.83
, judge
Weight: 0.74
, court
Weight: 0.73
, tribunal
Weight: 0.72
Siblings john marshall
Weight: 0.58
, roe
Weight: 0.53
, county court
Weight: 0.40
, tennis court
Weight: 0.39
, basketball court
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called protector of fundamental rights 1.00
protector of fundamental rights 1.00
be called protector of rights 0.96
protector of rights 0.95
be called protector 0.89
be called guardian of constitution 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(supreme court, be called protector of fundamental rights)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(supreme court, be called protector of fundamental rights)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(supreme court, be called protector of fundamental rights)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(supreme court, protector of fundamental rights)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(supreme court, be called protector of fundamental rights)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(supreme court, be called protector of rights)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(supreme court, be called protector of fundamental rights)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(supreme court, be called protector of rights)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(supreme court, be called protector of fundamental rights)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(supreme court, protector of fundamental rights)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(supreme court, be called protector of fundamental rights)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(supreme court, be called protector)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(supreme court, be called protector of fundamental rights)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(supreme court, be called protector of rights)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(supreme court, be called protector of fundamental rights)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(supreme court, be called protector)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(supreme court, be called protector of fundamental rights)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(supreme court, protector of fundamental rights)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(supreme court, be called protector of fundamental rights)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(supreme court, be called protector)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(supreme court, be called protector of fundamental rights)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(supreme court, protector of rights)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(supreme court, be called protector of fundamental rights)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(supreme court, be called protector of rights)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(supreme court, be called protector of fundamental rights)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(supreme court, protector of rights)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(supreme court, be called protector of fundamental rights)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(supreme court, protector of rights)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(supreme court, be called protector of fundamental rights)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(supreme court, protector of rights)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(supreme court, be called protector of fundamental rights)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(supreme court, be called protector)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(supreme court, be called protector of fundamental rights)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(supreme court, protector of fundamental rights)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(supreme court, be called protector of fundamental rights)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(supreme court, be called guardian of constitution)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(supreme court, be called protector of fundamental rights)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(supreme court, be called guardian of constitution)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(supreme court, be called protector of fundamental rights)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(supreme court, be called guardian of constitution)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(supreme court, be called protector of fundamental rights)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(supreme court, be called guardian of constitution)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(supreme court, be called protector of fundamental rights)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(supreme court, be called protector of fundamental rights)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(supreme court, be called protector of fundamental rights)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(supreme court, be called protector of fundamental rights)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(supreme court, be called protector of fundamental rights)