surgeon: be under threat

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents physician
Weight: 0.71
, medical doctor
Weight: 0.68
, doctor
Weight: 0.65
, person
Weight: 0.63
, specialist
Weight: 0.57
Siblings gynecologist
Weight: 0.38
, obstetrician
Weight: 0.36
, psychiatrist
Weight: 0.36
, dentist
Weight: 0.36
, clinic
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be under threat 1.00
have under threat jobs 0.91

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(medical doctor, be under threat)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(surgeon, be under threat)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(surgeon, be under threat)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(medical doctor, be under threat)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(surgeon, be under threat)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(medical doctor, be under threat)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(medical doctor, be under threat)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(surgeon, be under threat)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(surgeon, be under threat)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(surgeon, be under threat)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(surgeon, be under threat)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(surgeon, be under threat)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(surgeon, have under threat jobs)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(surgeon, be under threat)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(surgeon, have under threat jobs)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(surgeon, be under threat)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(surgeon, have under threat jobs)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(surgeon, be under threat)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(surgeon, have under threat jobs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(surgeon, be under threat)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(surgeon, be under threat)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(surgeon, be under threat)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(surgeon, be under threat)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(surgeon, be under threat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(surgeon, be under threat)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(medical doctor, be under threat)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(surgeon, be under threat)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(medical doctor, be under threat)