surgery: be for lazy eye performed

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents surgical procedure
Weight: 0.59
, treatment
Weight: 0.59
, intervention
Weight: 0.58
, cause
Weight: 0.57
, hospital care
Weight: 0.57
Siblings hysterectomy
Weight: 0.76
, plastic surgery
Weight: 0.70
, appendectomy
Weight: 0.66
, tonsillectomy
Weight: 0.64
, hip
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
be for lazy eye performed 1.00
be for eye performed 0.92
be for lazy eye 0.91
be for eye 0.82
is performed nowadays 0.82
be performed 0.81
is performed 0.81
be performed treat 0.80
be performed today 0.79
be done on nose 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(surgery, be for lazy eye performed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(plastic surgery, be performed)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(surgery, be for lazy eye performed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(tonsillectomy, is performed nowadays)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(surgery, be for lazy eye performed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(plastic surgery, be done on nose)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(surgery, be for lazy eye performed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(appendectomy, be performed)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(surgery, be for lazy eye performed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(hysterectomy, is performed)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(surgery, be for lazy eye performed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(tonsillectomy, is performed)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(surgery, be for lazy eye performed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(tonsillectomy, be performed today)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(surgery, be for lazy eye performed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(tonsillectomy, is performed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(tonsillectomy, is performed)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(surgery, be for lazy eye performed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(hysterectomy, is performed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(hysterectomy, is performed)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(surgery, be for lazy eye performed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(appendectomy, be performed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(appendectomy, be performed)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(surgery, be for lazy eye performed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(plastic surgery, be done on nose) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(plastic surgery, be done on nose)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(surgery, be for lazy eye performed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(tonsillectomy, be performed today) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(tonsillectomy, be performed today)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(surgery, be for lazy eye performed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(tonsillectomy, is performed nowadays) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(tonsillectomy, is performed nowadays)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(surgery, be for lazy eye performed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(plastic surgery, be performed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(plastic surgery, be performed)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(surgery, be for lazy eye performed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(surgery, be for lazy eye performed)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(surgery, be for lazy eye performed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(surgery, be for lazy eye)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(surgery, be for lazy eye performed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(surgery, be for lazy eye)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(surgery, be for lazy eye performed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(surgery, be for lazy eye)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(surgery, be for lazy eye performed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(surgery, be performed)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(surgery, be for lazy eye performed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(surgery, be for lazy eye)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(surgery, be for lazy eye performed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(surgery, be for eye)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(surgery, be for lazy eye performed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(surgery, be for eye performed)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(surgery, be for lazy eye performed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(surgery, be performed treat)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(surgery, be for lazy eye performed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(surgery, be performed treat)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(surgery, be for lazy eye performed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(surgery, be for eye performed)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(surgery, be for lazy eye performed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(surgery, be for eye performed)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(surgery, be for lazy eye performed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(surgery, be performed)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(surgery, be for lazy eye performed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(surgery, be performed treat)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(surgery, be for lazy eye performed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(surgery, be performed)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(surgery, be for lazy eye performed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(surgery, be performed treat)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(surgery, be for lazy eye performed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(surgery, be for eye performed)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(surgery, be for lazy eye performed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(surgery, be for eye)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(surgery, be for lazy eye performed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(surgery, be for eye)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(surgery, be for lazy eye performed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(surgery, be performed)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(surgery, be for lazy eye performed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(surgery, be for eye)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(surgery, be for lazy eye performed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(surgery, be for lazy eye performed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(surgery, be for lazy eye performed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(surgery, be for lazy eye performed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(surgery, be for lazy eye performed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(surgery, be for lazy eye performed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(tonsillectomy, is performed)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(surgery, be for lazy eye performed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(hysterectomy, is performed)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(surgery, be for lazy eye performed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(appendectomy, be performed)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(surgery, be for lazy eye performed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(plastic surgery, be performed)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(surgery, be for lazy eye performed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(tonsillectomy, is performed nowadays)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(surgery, be for lazy eye performed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(tonsillectomy, be performed today)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(surgery, be for lazy eye performed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(plastic surgery, be done on nose)