surgery: be risk for dvt

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents surgical procedure
Weight: 0.59
, treatment
Weight: 0.59
, intervention
Weight: 0.58
, cause
Weight: 0.57
, hospital care
Weight: 0.57
Siblings hysterectomy
Weight: 0.76
, plastic surgery
Weight: 0.70
, appendectomy
Weight: 0.66
, tonsillectomy
Weight: 0.64
, hip
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
be risk for dvt 1.00
is risk 0.98
is risk factor for dvt 0.90
increase risk of dvt 0.89
increase risk 0.89
is risk factor 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(surgery, be risk for dvt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(plastic surgery, is risk)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(surgery, be risk for dvt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(plastic surgery, is risk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(plastic surgery, is risk)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(surgery, be risk for dvt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(surgery, be risk for dvt)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(surgery, be risk for dvt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(surgery, is risk factor)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(surgery, be risk for dvt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(surgery, is risk)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(surgery, be risk for dvt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(surgery, increase risk)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(surgery, be risk for dvt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(surgery, is risk)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(surgery, be risk for dvt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(surgery, increase risk)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(surgery, be risk for dvt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(surgery, increase risk)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(surgery, be risk for dvt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(surgery, is risk)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(surgery, be risk for dvt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(surgery, is risk)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(surgery, be risk for dvt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(surgery, increase risk of dvt)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(surgery, be risk for dvt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(surgery, increase risk)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(surgery, be risk for dvt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(surgery, increase risk of dvt)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(surgery, be risk for dvt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(surgery, is risk factor)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(surgery, be risk for dvt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(surgery, increase risk of dvt)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(surgery, be risk for dvt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(surgery, is risk factor for dvt)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(surgery, be risk for dvt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(surgery, increase risk of dvt)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(surgery, be risk for dvt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(surgery, is risk factor for dvt)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(surgery, be risk for dvt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(surgery, is risk factor)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(surgery, be risk for dvt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(surgery, is risk factor for dvt)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(surgery, be risk for dvt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(surgery, is risk factor for dvt)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(surgery, be risk for dvt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(surgery, is risk factor)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(surgery, be risk for dvt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(surgery, be risk for dvt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(surgery, be risk for dvt)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(surgery, be risk for dvt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(surgery, be risk for dvt)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(surgery, be risk for dvt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(plastic surgery, is risk)