surgery: is competitive

Related concepts

Parents	surgical procedure Weight: 0.59 , treatment Weight: 0.59 , intervention Weight: 0.58 , cause Weight: 0.57 , hospital care Weight: 0.57
Siblings	hysterectomy Weight: 0.76 , plastic surgery Weight: 0.70 , appendectomy Weight: 0.66 , tonsillectomy Weight: 0.64 , hip Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property	Similarity
is competitive	1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(surgery, is competitive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Remarkable(plastic surgery, is competitive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.83

Plausible(surgery, is competitive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

Remarkable(plastic surgery, is competitive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Plausible(plastic surgery, is competitive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.83

Plausible(surgery, is competitive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Salient(surgery, is competitive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.88

Salient(surgery, is competitive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Typical(surgery, is competitive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(surgery, is competitive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.83

Plausible(surgery, is competitive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Typical(surgery, is competitive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(surgery, is competitive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(plastic surgery, is competitive)