surgery: was done in 1800s

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents surgical procedure
Weight: 0.59
, treatment
Weight: 0.59
, intervention
Weight: 0.58
, cause
Weight: 0.57
, hospital care
Weight: 0.57
Siblings hysterectomy
Weight: 0.76
, plastic surgery
Weight: 0.70
, appendectomy
Weight: 0.66
, tonsillectomy
Weight: 0.64
, hip
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
was done in 1800s 1.00
is done 0.96
be done 0.96
was done discovered 0.90
be done in morning 0.88
be done on nose 0.82
was good 0.80
is performed nowadays 0.77
be done on space station 0.77
be performed today 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(surgery, was done in 1800s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(plastic surgery, be done on nose)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(surgery, was done in 1800s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(plastic surgery, be done)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(surgery, was done in 1800s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(plastic surgery, is done)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(surgery, was done in 1800s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(hysterectomy, is done)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(surgery, was done in 1800s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(tonsillectomy, is performed nowadays)
...

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(surgery, was done in 1800s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(tonsillectomy, is done) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(tonsillectomy, is done)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(surgery, was done in 1800s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(hysterectomy, is done) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(hysterectomy, is done)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(surgery, was done in 1800s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(plastic surgery, is done) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(plastic surgery, is done)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(surgery, was done in 1800s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(plastic surgery, be done) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(plastic surgery, be done)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(surgery, was done in 1800s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(plastic surgery, be done on nose) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(plastic surgery, be done on nose)
...

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(surgery, was done in 1800s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(surgery, was done in 1800s)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(surgery, was done in 1800s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(surgery, was done discovered)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(surgery, was done in 1800s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(surgery, was done discovered)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(surgery, was done in 1800s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(surgery, be done in morning)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(surgery, was done in 1800s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(surgery, be done in morning)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(surgery, was done in 1800s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(surgery, was done discovered)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(surgery, was done in 1800s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(surgery, was done in 1800s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(surgery, was done in 1800s)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(surgery, was done in 1800s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(surgery, was done in 1800s)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(surgery, was done in 1800s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(tonsillectomy, is done)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(surgery, was done in 1800s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(hysterectomy, is done)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(surgery, was done in 1800s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(plastic surgery, is done)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(surgery, was done in 1800s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(plastic surgery, be done)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(surgery, was done in 1800s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(plastic surgery, be done on nose)
...