surgical procedure: be evaluated

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents intervention
Weight: 0.67
, complication
Weight: 0.64
, service
Weight: 0.63
, method
Weight: 0.61
Siblings plastic surgery
Weight: 0.83
, mastectomy
Weight: 0.77
, tonsillectomy
Weight: 0.76
, hysterectomy
Weight: 0.76
, ablation
Weight: 0.71

Related properties

Property Similarity
be evaluated 1.00
evaluation 0.81
be measured 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(service, evaluation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(surgical procedure, be evaluated)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(service, be measured) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(surgical procedure, be evaluated)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(surgical procedure, be evaluated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(service, evaluation)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(surgical procedure, be evaluated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(service, be measured)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(surgical procedure, be evaluated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(service, be measured)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(surgical procedure, be evaluated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(service, evaluation)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(service, evaluation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(surgical procedure, be evaluated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(surgical procedure, be evaluated)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(service, be measured) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(surgical procedure, be evaluated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(surgical procedure, be evaluated)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(surgical procedure, be evaluated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(surgical procedure, be evaluated)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(surgical procedure, be evaluated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(surgical procedure, be evaluated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(surgical procedure, be evaluated)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(surgical procedure, be evaluated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(surgical procedure, be evaluated)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(surgical procedure, be evaluated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(service, evaluation)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(surgical procedure, be evaluated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(service, be measured)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(surgical procedure, be evaluated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(service, evaluation)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(surgical procedure, be evaluated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(service, be measured)