surprise: is banned

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents emotion
Weight: 0.64
, revelation
Weight: 0.64
, element
Weight: 0.62
, fact
Weight: 0.60
, event
Weight: 0.59
Siblings shock
Weight: 0.35
, disappointment
Weight: 0.35
, shame
Weight: 0.33
, embarrassment
Weight: 0.33
, joy
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is banned 1.00
be banned in states 0.91
be banned in usa 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(surprise, is banned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(joy, is banned)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(surprise, is banned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(joy, be banned in usa)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(surprise, is banned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(joy, is banned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(joy, is banned)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(surprise, is banned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(joy, be banned in usa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(joy, be banned in usa)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(surprise, is banned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(surprise, is banned)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(surprise, is banned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(surprise, be banned in states)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(surprise, is banned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(surprise, be banned in states)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(surprise, is banned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(surprise, be banned in states)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(surprise, is banned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(surprise, be banned in states)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(surprise, is banned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(surprise, be banned in usa)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(surprise, is banned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(surprise, is banned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(surprise, is banned)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(surprise, is banned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(surprise, is banned)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(surprise, is banned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(joy, is banned)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(surprise, is banned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(joy, be banned in usa)