surveillance: be at casino

Related concepts

Parents	practice Weight: 0.60 , mission Weight: 0.59 , service Weight: 0.58 , security system Weight: 0.57 , operation Weight: 0.57
Siblings	security guard Weight: 0.33 , observation Weight: 0.32 , computer network Weight: 0.31 , fingerprint Weight: 0.31 , firewall Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be at casino	1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(surveillance, be at casino) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Remarkable(security guard, be at casino)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.01

Plausible(surveillance, be at casino) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

Remarkable(security guard, be at casino) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Plausible(security guard, be at casino)

Salient implies Plausible

0.01

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.03
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.01

Plausible(surveillance, be at casino) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Salient(surveillance, be at casino)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.98

Salient(surveillance, be at casino) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Typical(surveillance, be at casino) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(surveillance, be at casino)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.01

Plausible(surveillance, be at casino) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Typical(surveillance, be at casino)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(surveillance, be at casino) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Typical(security guard, be at casino)