survival: be important to animals

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mode
Weight: 0.62
, trait
Weight: 0.61
, goal
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.57
, situation
Weight: 0.57
Siblings human life
Weight: 0.32
, loyalty
Weight: 0.31
, immune response
Weight: 0.31
, condition
Weight: 0.31
, living thing
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to animals 1.00
be important to humans 0.84
be in animal kingdom 0.78
was important to human society 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(survival, be important to animals)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(survival, be important to animals)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(survival, be important to animals)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(survival, be important to humans)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(survival, be important to animals)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(survival, be important to humans)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(survival, be important to animals)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(survival, be important to humans)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(survival, be important to animals)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(survival, be in animal kingdom)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(survival, be important to animals)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(survival, be in animal kingdom)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(survival, be important to animals)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(survival, be in animal kingdom)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(survival, be important to animals)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(survival, be in animal kingdom)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(survival, be important to animals)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(survival, be important to humans)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(survival, be important to animals)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(survival, was important to human society)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(survival, be important to animals)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(survival, was important to human society)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(survival, be important to animals)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(survival, was important to human society)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(survival, be important to animals)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(survival, was important to human society)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(survival, be important to animals)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(survival, be important to animals)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(survival, be important to animals)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(survival, be important to animals)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(survival, be important to animals)