swamp: be at michigan

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents obstacle
Weight: 0.58
, environment
Weight: 0.55
, fresh water
Weight: 0.54
, shallow water
Weight: 0.53
, name
Weight: 0.51
Siblings sea water
Weight: 0.33
, river
Weight: 0.33
, marsh
Weight: 0.33
, pond
Weight: 0.32
, waterfall
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at michigan 1.00
be at wisconsin 0.87
be at florida 0.85
be at louisiana 0.80
be at north america 0.77
be at africa 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(swamp, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(river, be at wisconsin)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(swamp, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(marsh, be at florida)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(swamp, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(marsh, be at louisiana)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(swamp, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(river, be at north america)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(swamp, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(river, be at africa)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(swamp, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(river, be at wisconsin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(river, be at wisconsin)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(swamp, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(marsh, be at florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(marsh, be at florida)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(swamp, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(marsh, be at louisiana) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(marsh, be at louisiana)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(swamp, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(river, be at north america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(river, be at north america)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(swamp, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(river, be at africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(river, be at africa)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(swamp, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(swamp, be at michigan)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(swamp, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(swamp, be at louisiana)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(swamp, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(swamp, be at louisiana)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(swamp, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(swamp, be at louisiana)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(swamp, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(swamp, be at louisiana)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(swamp, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(swamp, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(swamp, be at michigan)

Typical implies Plausible

0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(swamp, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(swamp, be at michigan)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(swamp, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(river, be at wisconsin)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(swamp, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(marsh, be at florida)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(swamp, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(marsh, be at louisiana)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(swamp, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(river, be at north america)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(swamp, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(river, be at africa)