swamp: be more productive than streams

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents obstacle
Weight: 0.58
, environment
Weight: 0.55
, fresh water
Weight: 0.54
, shallow water
Weight: 0.53
, name
Weight: 0.51
Siblings sea water
Weight: 0.33
, river
Weight: 0.33
, marsh
Weight: 0.33
, pond
Weight: 0.32
, ditch
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more productive than streams 1.00
be more productive than streams answerscom 1.00
be more productive than stream 0.97

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(swamp, be more productive than streams) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(swamp, be more productive than streams)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(swamp, be more productive than streams) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(swamp, be more productive than streams answerscom)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(swamp, be more productive than streams) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(swamp, be more productive than streams answerscom)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(swamp, be more productive than streams) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(swamp, be more productive than stream)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(swamp, be more productive than streams) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(swamp, be more productive than stream)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(swamp, be more productive than streams) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(swamp, be more productive than streams answerscom)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(swamp, be more productive than streams) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(swamp, be more productive than stream)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(swamp, be more productive than streams) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(swamp, be more productive than streams answerscom)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(swamp, be more productive than streams) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(swamp, be more productive than stream)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(swamp, be more productive than streams) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(swamp, be more productive than streams) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(swamp, be more productive than streams)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(swamp, be more productive than streams) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(swamp, be more productive than streams)