swaziland: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents country
Weight: 0.55
, place
Weight: 0.54
, nation
Weight: 0.47
, location
Weight: 0.44
, south africa
Weight: 0.42
Siblings central african republic
Weight: 0.28
, central american country
Weight: 0.28
, czech republic
Weight: 0.28
, west germany
Weight: 0.28

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
is poor 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(country, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(swaziland, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(country, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(swaziland, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(swaziland, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(country, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(swaziland, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(country, is poor)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(swaziland, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(country, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(swaziland, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(country, is poor)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(swaziland, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(czech republic, is poor)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(swaziland, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(central african republic, is poor)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(swaziland, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(central american country, is poor)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(country, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(swaziland, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(swaziland, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(country, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(swaziland, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(swaziland, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(swaziland, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(central american country, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(central american country, is poor)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(swaziland, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(central african republic, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(central african republic, is poor)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(swaziland, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(czech republic, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(czech republic, is poor)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(swaziland, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(swaziland, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(swaziland, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(swaziland, has quality good)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(swaziland, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(swaziland, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(swaziland, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(swaziland, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(swaziland, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(swaziland, is poor)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(swaziland, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(swaziland, is poor)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(swaziland, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(swaziland, is poor)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(swaziland, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(swaziland, is poor)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(swaziland, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(swaziland, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(swaziland, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(swaziland, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(swaziland, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(swaziland, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(swaziland, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(swaziland, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(country, has quality bad)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(swaziland, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(country, is poor)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(swaziland, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(czech republic, is poor)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(swaziland, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(central american country, is poor)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(swaziland, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(central african republic, is poor)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(swaziland, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(country, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(swaziland, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(country, is poor)