sweat: has state lot

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents symptom
Weight: 0.59
, factor
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.57
, sign
Weight: 0.57
, substance
Weight: 0.56
Siblings sweating
Weight: 0.33
, dirty clothes
Weight: 0.32
, grease
Weight: 0.32
, bad breath
Weight: 0.32
, wash cloth
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state lot 1.00
has quality good 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(sweat, has state lot)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(sweating, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(sweat, has state lot)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(grease, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(sweat, has state lot)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(grease, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(grease, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(sweat, has state lot)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(sweating, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(sweating, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(sweat, has state lot)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(sweat, has state lot)

Similarity expansion

0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(sweat, has state lot)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(sweat, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(sweat, has state lot)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(sweat, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(sweat, has state lot)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(sweat, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(sweat, has state lot)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(sweat, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(sweat, has state lot)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(sweat, has state lot)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(sweat, has state lot)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(sweat, has state lot)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(sweat, has state lot)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(sweat, has state lot)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(sweating, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(sweat, has state lot)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(grease, has quality good)