sweet potato: be better than white potato

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents potato
Weight: 0.74
, vegetable
Weight: 0.74
, flavor
Weight: 0.73
, onion ring
Weight: 0.69
Siblings butternut
Weight: 0.54
, potato salad
Weight: 0.40
, tomato sauce
Weight: 0.39
, pear
Weight: 0.38
, tomato juice
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than white potato 1.00
be better than potato 0.97
be healthier than white potato 0.94
be better than regular potato 0.92
be better than potatoes 0.92
be better than ordinary potato 0.91
be healthier than potato 0.91
be harder than white potatoes 0.91
be healthier than white potatoes 0.90
be called potato 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(potato, be better than potatoes)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(sweet potato, be better than white potato)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(potato, be called potato)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(sweet potato, be better than white potato)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(sweet potato, be better than white potato)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(potato, be called potato)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(sweet potato, be better than white potato)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(potato, be better than potatoes)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, be better than white potato)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(potato, be better than potatoes)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, be better than white potato)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(potato, be called potato)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(potato, be better than potatoes)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(sweet potato, be better than white potato)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(sweet potato, be better than white potato)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(potato, be called potato)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(sweet potato, be better than white potato)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(sweet potato, be better than white potato)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(sweet potato, be better than white potato)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(sweet potato, be better than white potato)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(sweet potato, be better than white potato)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(sweet potato, be better than potato)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(sweet potato, be better than white potato)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(sweet potato, be better than potato)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(sweet potato, be better than white potato)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(sweet potato, be better than potato)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(sweet potato, be better than white potato)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(sweet potato, be healthier than white potato)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(sweet potato, be better than white potato)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(sweet potato, be better than potatoes)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(sweet potato, be better than white potato)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(sweet potato, be better than potatoes)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(sweet potato, be better than white potato)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(sweet potato, be better than regular potato)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(sweet potato, be better than white potato)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(sweet potato, be better than ordinary potato)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(sweet potato, be better than white potato)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(sweet potato, be called potato)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(sweet potato, be better than white potato)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(sweet potato, be healthier than potato)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(sweet potato, be better than white potato)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(sweet potato, be healthier than potato)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(sweet potato, be better than white potato)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(sweet potato, be harder than white potatoes)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(sweet potato, be better than white potato)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(sweet potato, be better than potatoes)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(sweet potato, be better than white potato)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(sweet potato, be healthier than white potatoes)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(sweet potato, be better than white potato)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(sweet potato, be called potato)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(sweet potato, be better than white potato)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(sweet potato, be healthier than white potato)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(sweet potato, be better than white potato)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(sweet potato, be better than ordinary potato)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(sweet potato, be better than white potato)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(sweet potato, be called potato)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(sweet potato, be better than white potato)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(sweet potato, be better than regular potato)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(sweet potato, be better than white potato)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(sweet potato, be healthier than potato)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(sweet potato, be better than white potato)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(sweet potato, be healthier than white potato)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(sweet potato, be better than white potato)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(sweet potato, be harder than white potatoes)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(sweet potato, be better than white potato)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(sweet potato, be better than ordinary potato)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(sweet potato, be better than white potato)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(sweet potato, be better than regular potato)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(sweet potato, be better than white potato)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(sweet potato, be healthier than white potatoes)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(sweet potato, be better than white potato)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(sweet potato, be harder than white potatoes)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(sweet potato, be better than white potato)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(sweet potato, be healthier than white potatoes)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(sweet potato, be better than white potato)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, be healthier than white potato)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(sweet potato, be better than white potato)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, be harder than white potatoes)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(sweet potato, be better than white potato)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, be healthier than white potatoes)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(sweet potato, be better than white potato)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, be better than regular potato)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(sweet potato, be better than white potato)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, be better than potato)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(sweet potato, be better than white potato)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, be better than ordinary potato)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(sweet potato, be better than white potato)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, be better than potatoes)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(sweet potato, be better than white potato)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, be healthier than potato)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(sweet potato, be better than white potato)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, be called potato)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(sweet potato, be better than white potato)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(sweet potato, be better than white potato)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, be better than white potato)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(sweet potato, be better than white potato)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(sweet potato, be better than white potato)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, be better than white potato)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(potato, be called potato)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, be better than white potato)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(potato, be better than potatoes)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(sweet potato, be better than white potato)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(potato, be called potato)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(sweet potato, be better than white potato)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(potato, be better than potatoes)