sweet potato: be good losing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents potato
Weight: 0.74
, vegetable
Weight: 0.74
, flavor
Weight: 0.73
, onion ring
Weight: 0.69
Siblings butternut
Weight: 0.54
, potato salad
Weight: 0.40
, tomato sauce
Weight: 0.39
, pear
Weight: 0.38
, tomato juice
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good losing 1.00
be good for weight loss 0.79
be good for face 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, be good losing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(pear, be good for weight loss)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, be good losing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(tomato juice, be good for face)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(sweet potato, be good losing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(tomato juice, be good for face) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(tomato juice, be good for face)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(sweet potato, be good losing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(pear, be good for weight loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(pear, be good for weight loss)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(sweet potato, be good losing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(sweet potato, be good losing)

Similarity expansion

0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(sweet potato, be good losing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, be good for weight loss)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(sweet potato, be good losing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(sweet potato, be good for weight loss)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(sweet potato, be good losing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(sweet potato, be good for weight loss)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(sweet potato, be good losing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(sweet potato, be good for weight loss)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(sweet potato, be good losing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(sweet potato, be good losing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, be good losing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(sweet potato, be good losing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(sweet potato, be good losing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, be good losing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(pear, be good for weight loss)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, be good losing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(tomato juice, be good for face)