sword: storm of is two parts

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents weapon
Weight: 0.62
, artifact
Weight: 0.61
, blade
Weight: 0.59
, tool
Weight: 0.59
Siblings gladiator
Weight: 0.54
, rapier
Weight: 0.53
, submachine gun
Weight: 0.36
, spear
Weight: 0.35
, knife
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
storm of is two parts 1.00
ruin heroes of storm 0.80
be different from western ones 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(artifact, ruin heroes of storm) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(sword, storm of is two parts)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(sword, storm of is two parts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(artifact, ruin heroes of storm)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(sword, storm of is two parts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(artifact, ruin heroes of storm)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(artifact, ruin heroes of storm) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(sword, storm of is two parts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(sword, storm of is two parts)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(sword, storm of is two parts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(sword, storm of is two parts)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(sword, storm of is two parts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(sword, be different from western ones)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(sword, storm of is two parts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(sword, be different from western ones)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(sword, storm of is two parts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(sword, be different from western ones)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(sword, storm of is two parts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(sword, be different from western ones)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(sword, storm of is two parts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(sword, storm of is two parts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(sword, storm of is two parts)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(sword, storm of is two parts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(sword, storm of is two parts)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(sword, storm of is two parts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(artifact, ruin heroes of storm)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(sword, storm of is two parts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(artifact, ruin heroes of storm)