sydney: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents australia
Weight: 0.63
, new zealand
Weight: 0.60
, city
Weight: 0.59
, town
Weight: 0.56
, place
Weight: 0.56
Siblings tasmania
Weight: 0.35
, western australia
Weight: 0.35
, perth
Weight: 0.35
, brisbane
Weight: 0.34
, usa
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
have bad internet 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(australia, have bad internet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(sydney, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(sydney, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(australia, have bad internet)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(sydney, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(australia, have bad internet)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(australia, have bad internet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(sydney, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(sydney, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(sydney, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(sydney, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(sydney, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(sydney, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(sydney, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(sydney, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(sydney, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(sydney, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(australia, have bad internet)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(sydney, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(australia, have bad internet)