symbol: were used in illuminated manuscripts

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents logo
Weight: 0.63
, element
Weight: 0.62
, label
Weight: 0.61
, mark
Weight: 0.59
, figure
Weight: 0.59
Siblings accent mark
Weight: 0.59
, glyph
Weight: 0.48
, metaphor
Weight: 0.32
, expression
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
were used in illuminated manuscripts 1.00
be used in literature 0.76
is used in literature 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(symbol, were used in illuminated manuscripts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(metaphor, be used in literature)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(symbol, were used in illuminated manuscripts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(metaphor, be used in literature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(metaphor, be used in literature)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(symbol, were used in illuminated manuscripts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(symbol, were used in illuminated manuscripts)

Similarity expansion

0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(symbol, were used in illuminated manuscripts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(symbol, be used in literature)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(symbol, were used in illuminated manuscripts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(symbol, be used in literature)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(symbol, were used in illuminated manuscripts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(symbol, is used in literature)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(symbol, were used in illuminated manuscripts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(symbol, be used in literature)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(symbol, were used in illuminated manuscripts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(symbol, is used in literature)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(symbol, were used in illuminated manuscripts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(symbol, is used in literature)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(symbol, were used in illuminated manuscripts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(symbol, is used in literature)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(symbol, were used in illuminated manuscripts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(symbol, be used in literature)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(symbol, were used in illuminated manuscripts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(symbol, were used in illuminated manuscripts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(symbol, were used in illuminated manuscripts)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(symbol, were used in illuminated manuscripts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(symbol, were used in illuminated manuscripts)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(symbol, were used in illuminated manuscripts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(metaphor, be used in literature)