synagogue: were affected during night of broken glass

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents building
Weight: 0.65
, institution
Weight: 0.60
, target
Weight: 0.59
, structure
Weight: 0.57
Siblings rabbi
Weight: 0.56
, mosque
Weight: 0.35
, apartment building
Weight: 0.35
, chapel
Weight: 0.35
, temple
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
were affected during night of broken glass 1.00
were affected during night of glass 0.96
were affected during night 0.89
have stained glass windows 0.78
were burned during kristallnacht 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(synagogue, were affected during night of broken glass)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(synagogue, were affected during night of broken glass)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(synagogue, were affected during night of broken glass)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(synagogue, were affected during night of glass)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(synagogue, were affected during night of broken glass)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(synagogue, were affected during night)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(synagogue, were affected during night of broken glass)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(synagogue, were affected during night of glass)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(synagogue, were affected during night of broken glass)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(synagogue, were affected during night of glass)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(synagogue, were affected during night of broken glass)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(synagogue, were affected during night)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(synagogue, were affected during night of broken glass)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(synagogue, have stained glass windows)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(synagogue, were affected during night of broken glass)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(synagogue, were burned during kristallnacht)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(synagogue, were affected during night of broken glass)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(synagogue, were burned during kristallnacht)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(synagogue, were affected during night of broken glass)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(synagogue, were affected during night)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(synagogue, were affected during night of broken glass)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(synagogue, were burned during kristallnacht)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(synagogue, were affected during night of broken glass)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(synagogue, have stained glass windows)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(synagogue, were affected during night of broken glass)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(synagogue, have stained glass windows)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(synagogue, were affected during night of broken glass)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(synagogue, were burned during kristallnacht)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(synagogue, were affected during night of broken glass)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(synagogue, were affected during night of glass)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(synagogue, were affected during night of broken glass)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(synagogue, have stained glass windows)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(synagogue, were affected during night of broken glass)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(synagogue, were affected during night)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(synagogue, were affected during night of broken glass)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(synagogue, were affected during night of broken glass)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(synagogue, were affected during night of broken glass)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(synagogue, were affected during night of broken glass)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(synagogue, were affected during night of broken glass)