syphilis: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents infection
Weight: 0.70
, illness
Weight: 0.66
, sexual intercourse
Weight: 0.64
, disease
Weight: 0.60
, condition
Weight: 0.57
Siblings lyme disease
Weight: 0.38
, genital herpes
Weight: 0.37
, gonorrhea
Weight: 0.37
, tuberculosis
Weight: 0.37
, hepatitis
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
is bad people 0.80
hurt bad 0.77
has quality questions 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(infection, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(syphilis, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(syphilis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(infection, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(syphilis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(infection, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(syphilis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(hepatitis, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(syphilis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(tuberculosis, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(syphilis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(genital herpes, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(syphilis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(lyme disease, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(syphilis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(gonorrhea, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(syphilis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(hepatitis, has quality questions)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(syphilis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(genital herpes, hurt bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(infection, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(syphilis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(syphilis, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(syphilis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(genital herpes, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(genital herpes, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(syphilis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(gonorrhea, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(gonorrhea, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(syphilis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(lyme disease, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(lyme disease, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(syphilis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(hepatitis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(hepatitis, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(syphilis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(tuberculosis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(tuberculosis, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(syphilis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(genital herpes, hurt bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(genital herpes, hurt bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(syphilis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(hepatitis, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(hepatitis, has quality questions)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(syphilis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(syphilis, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(syphilis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(syphilis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(syphilis, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(syphilis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(syphilis, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(syphilis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(infection, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(syphilis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(genital herpes, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(syphilis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(hepatitis, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(syphilis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(lyme disease, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(syphilis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(tuberculosis, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(syphilis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(gonorrhea, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(syphilis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(hepatitis, has quality questions)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(syphilis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(genital herpes, hurt bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(syphilis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(infection, has quality bad)