system: be at it shop

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents structure
Weight: 0.72
, method
Weight: 0.62
, free software
Weight: 0.61
, device
Weight: 0.61
, discipline
Weight: 0.59
Siblings transformer
Weight: 0.62
, nuclear reactor
Weight: 0.62
, prism
Weight: 0.60
, radar
Weight: 0.59
, capacitor
Weight: 0.59

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at it shop 1.00
be used to store 0.82
be at computer store 0.78
store charge 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(system, be at it shop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(capacitor, store charge)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(system, be at it shop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(capacitor, store charge) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(capacitor, store charge)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(system, be at it shop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(system, be at it shop)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(system, be at it shop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(system, be at computer store)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(system, be at it shop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(system, be at computer store)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(system, be at it shop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(system, be used to store)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(system, be at it shop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(system, be at computer store)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(system, be at it shop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(system, be used to store)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(system, be at it shop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(system, be used to store)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(system, be at it shop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(system, be used to store)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(system, be at it shop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(system, be at computer store)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(system, be at it shop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(system, be at it shop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(system, be at it shop)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(system, be at it shop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(system, be at it shop)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(system, be at it shop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(capacitor, store charge)