t shirt: is thin now

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents item
Weight: 0.65
, clothes
Weight: 0.63
, swag
Weight: 0.61
, thing
Weight: 0.60
Siblings jacket
Weight: 0.58
, sweatshirt
Weight: 0.35
, jersey
Weight: 0.34
, scarf
Weight: 0.34
, sweater
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is thin now 1.00
is thin 0.98
is long now 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(t shirt, is thin now)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(sweater, is thin)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(t shirt, is thin now)
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(sweater, is thin)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(sweater, is thin)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(t shirt, is thin now)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(t shirt, is thin now)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(t shirt, is thin now)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(t shirt, is thin)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(t shirt, is thin now)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(t shirt, is thin)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(t shirt, is thin now)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(t shirt, is thin)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(t shirt, is thin now)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(t shirt, is long now)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(t shirt, is thin now)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(t shirt, is thin)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(t shirt, is thin now)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(t shirt, is long now)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(t shirt, is thin now)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(t shirt, is long now)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(t shirt, is thin now)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(t shirt, is long now)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(t shirt, is thin now)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(t shirt, is thin now)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(t shirt, is thin now)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(t shirt, is thin now)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(t shirt, is thin now)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(t shirt, is thin now)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(sweater, is thin)